[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tree has no patch log for version
From: |
Dustin Sallings |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tree has no patch log for version |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:03:51 -0700 |
On Saturday, Sep 13, 2003, at 09:37 US/Pacific, Robert Anderson wrote:
Sounds like you probably made two mistakes, both which would have been
trapped if you were using a more recent tla:
1) you committed to a mirror. You can't do that, and tla shouldn't let
you. What version are you using?
It didn't, I was wrong. dists--release-tla--1.1--patch-5
2) you probably used an alias of an archive name in a "tla get"
command,
which set the tree-version to the alias, which causes those "no patch
log for version" errors. tla shouldn't let you do that, either, and
current versions don't, I think.
Yes, that was correct. It did let me check it out, and got the
correct tree (I could build and stuff), but gave me the patch errors.
--
SPY My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <address@hidden>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] mirrors (was: tree has no patch log for version), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] mirrors (was: tree has no patch log for version), Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] mirrors (was: tree has no patch log for version), Robert Anderson, 2003/09/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] mirrors (was: tree has no patch log for version), Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] mirrors, Damien Elmes, 2003/09/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] mirrors, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] mirrors, Zack Brown, 2003/09/14
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tree has no patch log for version, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tree has no patch log for version,
Dustin Sallings <=