[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:28:32 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Tom> The negatives of "one big page" are: (a) more work for me;
> Tom> (b) unkind to web hosts.
> I think both are nearly negligible. For (a), two trivial (for you;
> let the contributors maintain them) implementations of "one big page"
> have been suggested already.
No good. I wind up spending an hour uploading the damn thing to the
GNU pages over my wimpy modem with every update. It gets worse if I
want to also put it on the "Low Budget Homepage" mirrors.
> For (b) it's static content. Octet
> count is modest (few if any images, no voice or movies), so bandwidth
> is negligible. What matters is hit count, and "one big page"
> (especially for reference material, which can be cached and accessed
> locally) clearly wins there.
Perhaps.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page, Zack Brown, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page, Tez Kamihira, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page, Tom Lord, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page, Tez Kamihira, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page, Doran Moppert, 2003/09/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tutorial as one big page, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/11
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tutorial as one big page, Michael Teichgräber, 2003/09/10