[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2
From: |
Tez Kamihira |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2 |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Sep 2003 10:10:29 +0900 (JST) |
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 08:48:58 +0900 (JST), Tez Kamihira <address@hidden> said:
>
> When
>
> changeset_size(n) ... uncompressed data size of changeset-n
> binary_size(n) ... uncompressed data size of total _binary data_ size
> in changeset-n
> current_rev ... current newest revision number
> working_directory_size(n) ... working directory size of pure revision-n
>
> then, very roughly,
>
Sorry, there is an ambiguous point.
In the above context, changeset_size(0) means total size of
the uncompressed base-0 revision.
- Tez
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, Tez Kamihira, 2003/09/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, Aspect, 2003/09/07
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH-0.0.2, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2003/09/07
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, John Goerzen, 2003/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, duchier, 2003/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, Robert Collins, 2003/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, duchier, 2003/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, Robert Collins, 2003/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, duchier, 2003/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, Robert Collins, 2003/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, Denys Duchier, 2003/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ViewARCH-0.0.2, Robert Collins, 2003/09/09