[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:56:23 +1000 |
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 12:29, Miles Bader wrote:
> However,
> the failure mode here is benign -- at worst, duplicate copies get sent
> (if someone follows up to a copy of the message added by the MLM for a
> non-subscribed mailing list, but the recipient headers also included a
> subscribed mailing list).
It's not benign: if the recipient is on one list of two, and the sender
of the reply is one the other, and finally, the list the recipient is on
doesn't allow un-subscribed posters.. the recipient won't get the mail
they otherwise would have.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging,
Robert Collins <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Miles Bader, 2003/08/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Specifying protocols [was: the dangers of no reply-to munging], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Federico Di Gregorio, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 2003/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] something _interesting_ for (Re: ... no reply-to munging ...), Tom Lord, 2003/08/22