[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful? |
Date: |
27 Aug 2003 10:48:48 +0900 |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> I prefer that it not be the default, but a --forward option to various
> merging commands would be fine.
Could it use a different name that `--forward', though? I find
the name --forward confusing enough with patch, which is pretty
low-level, but I think it would be even more odd in a higher-level
context like arch.
Something nice and obvious like `--ignore-patch-duplicates' or
something would be nice.
BTW, patch -N leaves around .rej files for rejected duplicates, without
any obvious indication that's what they are; I'm not sure whether that's
the right thing or not for arch...
-Miles
--
Next to fried food, the South has suffered most from oratory.
-- Walter Hines Page
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Stig Brautaset, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Ethan Benson, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Tom Lord, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?,
Miles Bader <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/27