[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update |
Date: |
19 Aug 2003 18:35:02 +0900 |
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" <address@hidden> writes:
> groff.7 reveals:
>
> SINGLE CHARACTER ESCAPES
> \" Beginning of a comment. Everything up to the end
> of the line is ignored.
I notice, by the way, that man files use:
.\"
at the beginning of the line for comments; I wonder if that is
different in some way than just \"
-Miles
--
"Though they may have different meanings, the cries of 'Yeeeee-haw!' and
'Allahu akbar!' are, in spirit, not actually all that different."
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2003/08/19
Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ganesh Sittampalam, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Egan, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Egan, 2003/08/23