Re: reading contacts from 6230

[Pawel Kot]

On 2/27/07, Baurzhan Ismagulov <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:39:00AM +0100, Pawel Kot wrote:
> > On 2/27/07, Baurzhan Ismagulov <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >Message received: 0x03 / 0x0116
> > >01 6e 00 08 00 01 01 00 00 10 00 05 00 01 00 00 |  n
> > >00 02 00 00 00 06 07 00 00 2c 01 26 00 xx 00 xx |          , & x x
> > >00 xx 00 xx 00 20 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx |  x x   x x x x x
> > >00 20 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx |    x x x x x x x
> > >00 00 0b 00 00 28 02 02 00 00 00 1c 00 2b 00 xx |      (       + x
> > >00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx |  x x x x x x x x
> > >00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 00 00 00 0b 00 00 28 03 03 |  x x x       (
> > >00 00 00 1c 00 2b 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx |      + x x x x x
> > >00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 00 |  x x x x x x x
> > >00 00 0b 00 00 24 04 06 00 00 00 18 00 2b 00 xx |      $       + x
> > >00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx 00 xx |  x x x x x x x x
> > >00 xx 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 30 05 28 00 44 00 2e |  x       0 ( D .
> > >00 52 00 2e 00 20 00 32 00 35 00 20 00 53 00 65 |  R .   2 5   S e
> > >00 70 00 74 00 2e 00 20 00 31 00 39 00 37 00 34 |  p t .   1 9 7 4
> > >00 20 00 00 00 00 0a 00 00 30 06 2a 00 50 00 61 |          0 * P a
> > >00 74 00 72 00 69 00 63 00 05 28 00 44 00 2e 00 |  t r i c  ( D .
> > >52 00 2e 00 20 00 32 00 35 00 20 00 53 00 65 00 | R .   2 5   S e
> > >70 00 74 00 2e 00                               | p t .
> ...
> > >See the "Patric" entry? On the phone it reads "Patrick D.R. 16 Oct.".
> >
> > Well, that *is* strange. But it seems to be gnokii bug. 00 05 28 is
> > probably one character.
>
> No, the text is a copy of the previous entry, the difference is roughly
> --- is
> +++ should
> -(D.R. 25 Sept.
> +k D.R. 16 Oct.
> with some byte shifts, of course.

Hm. We may have bug at the very low level loosing one octet. Or even
the kernel has the bug. It is reproducable? Can you make a copy of a
contact and check? Or modify?

> > >My point was, after we somehow identify the phone at startup, we use a
> > >kind of a hard-coded translation table to choose the best protocol under
> > >a given connection, and use that protocol for that session. At this
> > >stage we can inform the user that specifying the model "xxx" in the
> > >config file will make the startup faster (and, perhaps, other connection
> > >possibilities).
> >
> > Well, I'm thinking rather about providing a toll for autoconfiguration.
>
> I think I haven't explained that good enough. I'm also talking about
> autoconfiguration, not about supporting multiple protocols
> simultaneously. Is your idea of autoconfiguration different from mine?
> Or are you talking about a standalone tool that polls everything
> available and generates a .gnokiirc? Do you have a rough algorithm in
> mind?

Standalone tool that pools everything available and generates a
.gnokiirc. That would be later on to be merged into libgnokii.

take care,
pkot
--
Pawel Kot