[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses
From: |
BORBELY Zoltan |
Subject: |
Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:22:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:07:44PM +0200, Osma Suominen wrote:
> Actually half of my statemachine problems would be solved by having a
> real sm_block_no_retry(). Not having one was the reason that I wrote
> expect_message() (though the real issue was not as clear for me at that
> time than it is now). So if the statemachine gets a function that never
> retries, I only need to add a sm_block_many().
IMHO moving the call of the sm_incoming_acknowledge() function into the
fb3110_message_send() or fb3110_tx_frame_send() can solve this problem.
Bye,
Bozo
- statemachine flaws/weaknesses, Ladislav Michl, 2003/02/24
- Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses, Pawel Kot, 2003/02/24
- Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses, Pawel Kot, 2003/02/24
- Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses, Pawel Kot, 2003/02/24
- Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses, Pawel Kot, 2003/02/25
- Re: statemachine flaws/weaknesses, Pawel Kot, 2003/02/25