[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gNewSense-users] Re: Do we bother with digest at all?
From: |
Karl Goetz |
Subject: |
[gNewSense-users] Re: Do we bother with digest at all? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:37:27 +1030 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:23:02 +1030
Karl Goetz <address@hidden> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:08:38 +0300
> Niklas Cholmkvist <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > maybe it's better to copy and paste the subject you are replying to.
> > Change "Re: gNewSense-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 11" to something
> > meaningful.
> >
> > Cheers
>
> On this subject,
> Should we have digest at all? This list is around 10 messages a day,
> which isn't all that much by anyones standards.
> kk
I didn't see much opposition to removing digest (or convincing reasons
it should stay). I will look into removing it at a later date (it seems
pretty low priority to me ...).
kk
- --
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAkrYRd8ACgkQhIBzgCf88S5SbACeJLJATk+zCxBk82ltBsetcoMT
/sAAnibiVgM4EHYIDQenjqaRqrzFfZbg
=wsI8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----