Re: [gNewSense-users] KFV: how to handle COPYING?

[Karl Goetz]

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 17:01 -0400, Bake Timmons wrote:
> > My point is that:
> >
> Thus, summary scripts would be OK, since COPYING would appear as any
> other non-free item--except having a comment "waiver" (footnote).
> This would be less ambitious than what Sam suggests, since scripts
> would still be "ignorant" about non-free exceptions.  However, there
> is nothing preventing footnotes from being analyzed to provide such
> "knowledge" in the future.  Indeed, there might be additional bits of
> knowledge in footnotes that contribute to automated uses.

So to make sure i understand correctly: It would be marked /non-free/
with a note about why we include it, rather then /free/ with a note
about why we consider it free (its a licence).
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz <address@hidden>

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part