[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] [Artwork] Is Creative Commons Attribution Share-Al
Re: [gNewSense-users] [Artwork] Is Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license acceptable for Official gNewSense Artwork?
Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:36:37 +0000
Heirloom mailx 12.1 6/15/06
Karl Goetz <address@hidden> wrote:
> Dave Crossland wrote:
> > On 12/11/06, Karl Goetz <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> RMS says no CC licences are GPL compatible (which is hoped to change
> >> with CC3),
> > Do you have any references for this? :-)
> I'm trying to find it (no longer in my bookmarks :|)
> i cant find my original link, or anything authoritative atm, but if i
> spot it again I'll try to remember to email it.
Richard Stallman on P2P
"I no longer endorse Creative Commons. I cannot endorse Creative
Commons as a whole, because some of its licenses are unacceptable.
It would be self-delusion to try to endorse just some of the
Creative Commons licenses, because people lump them together; they
will misconstrue any endorsement of some as a blanket endorsement of
all. I therefore find myself constrained to reject Creative Commons
Nothing about GPL-compatibility there, but I'd expect CC's TPM-ban
would be an additional restriction and therefore GPL-incompatible.
Hope that helps,
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble