[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test
From: |
Udo Giacomozzi |
Subject: |
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Nov 2007 00:44:05 +0100 |
Hello Sandro,
Sunday, November 4, 2007, 11:54:26 PM, you wrote:
SS> Two examples in which your algorithm would fail:
SS> E2 -->
SS> +---------------+ Q : query point
SS> ^ | | E5 : nearest edge, no fill
SS> | | + | E3 E1..E4 : edges with right fill
SS> E1 | E5 | Q | |
SS> | + | V
SS> +---------------+
SS> <-- E4
This is not a valid example because E5 would need to have both fill
sides set.
SS> E2 -->
SS> +---------------+ Q : query point
SS> | |
SS> | |
SS> ^ | <-E5 | E5 : nearest edge, left fill (hole)
SS> | | +----+ | E3 E1..E4 : edges with right fill
SS> E1 | | | Q | |
SS> | +----+ | V
SS> +---------------+
SS> <-- E4
E5 would have it's right side fill style set and thus we get the
correct result (that Q is in the filled area).
SS> Note that both examples are valid topologies.
Don't agree, the first one is not correct AFAIK. A single path does
not have to be closed, but a complete shape must be closed by
definition, if I'm not wrong. If you place a edge inside a filled
area, it has to contain fill style information.
Udo
- Re[3]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, (continued)
- Re[3]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/05
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Bastiaan Jacques, 2007/11/06
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/05
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/05
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/05
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/05
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/04
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test,
Udo Giacomozzi <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/05
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/05
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Sandro Santilli, 2007/11/05
Re[3]: [Gnash-dev] Re: point test, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/11/05