[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance
From: |
Udo Giacomozzi |
Subject: |
Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:40:13 +0200 |
Hello strk,
Monday, August 27, 2007, 3:23:09 PM, you wrote:
s> What about making gnash::stream cache controllable by user ?
s> For example, tag loaders which intend to use the underlying stream
s> could disable caching, while others could cache the whole tag.
That won't work as the read-ahead cache would load data (= steal data)
from tu_file which instead should be read by these special tag
loaders.
I fear we won't be able to implement any kind of caching mechanism
unless *everything* uses "stream" to load data or bit-reading is
implemented in tu_file itself. The latter case is the worst thing I
can imagine.
Uh-oh..
Udo
- [Gnash-dev] Bitwise stream reading performance, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/08/25
- [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, strk, 2007/08/25
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, strk, 2007/08/27
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/08/27
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, strk, 2007/08/27
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, strk, 2007/08/27
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, strk, 2007/08/27
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance,
Udo Giacomozzi <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, strk, 2007/08/27
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/08/28
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, strk, 2007/08/28
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/08/28
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, strk, 2007/08/28
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: Bitwise stream reading performance, Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/08/28