[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_fi
From: |
Sandro Santilli |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-2127-g2e5e573 |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:22:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:44:51PM +0200, Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
>
> >Still, it seems like a good idea to make sure that either GcResources
> >are not created by threads other than the main thread, or that GC
> >becomes thread-safe.
>
> I ran the testsuite and a bunch of miscellaneous SWFs and thus far I
> have not found a movie that triggers a call to addCollectible() from a
> thread other than the main thread. Of course this is not positive
> assurance, but it seems a reasonable indication.
You're probably right, there must have been another reason then.
Maybe check commit 5dcdd0cf273a258250e4ea82b394f74bbd92823a
it could have been with deleting resources from GcResource
destructors. Maybe not a problem anymore as we leave ownership
purely to the GC.
--strk;
- [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-2127-g2e5e573, Bastiaan Jacques, 2014/06/10
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-2127-g2e5e573, Sandro Santilli, 2014/06/10
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-2127-g2e5e573, Bastiaan Jacques, 2014/06/10
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-2127-g2e5e573, Bastiaan Jacques, 2014/06/10
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-2127-g2e5e573,
Sandro Santilli <=
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_final-2127-g2e5e573, Richard Wilbur, 2014/06/10