Re: [Gnash-commit] /srv/bzr/gnash/trunk r11960: struct -> class reconstruction

[Benjamin Wolsey]

> Bwy, I agree with Markus about 'uniformity'.

Okay, if we want to add this to the coding guidelines it's fine by me. I
suggest using struct for classes with non-static public data members,
and class for classes without non non-static public data members.

This is because there's a functional difference in between classes where
you can set the data members directly and those where they are only
internally accessible.

The struct that Markus changed would then indeed be a class, because it
has no public data members at all.

> I don't think it's a big deal to have classes with all public members.

Neither do I, but that wasn't really the point.

--
The current release of Gnash is 0.8.7
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/

Benjamin Wolsey, Software Developer - http://benjaminwolsey.de
C++ and Open-Source Flash blog - http://www.benjaminwolsey.de/bwysblog

xmpp:address@hidden
http://identi.ca/bwy

signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil