Re: Still more :)

[Dragiša Durić]

Hello,

I have solved this vararg epic, but along the way one interesting situation happens:

Any suggestions?

TIA,

dd

On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 13:45 +0200, Dragiša Durić wrote:

Hi Gaius,

/opt/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0/m2/m2iso/Storage.def:58:1: error: the 2nd element does not exist in the array declaration used by the compound literal

My DEFINITION MODULE is like:

DEFINITION MODULE mStrIO;

FROM 

  SYSTEM

IMPORT

  ADDRESS;

TYPE

  Arr1  = ARRAY [0..0] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr2  = ARRAY [0..1] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr3  = ARRAY [0..2] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr4  = ARRAY [0..3] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr5  = ARRAY [0..4] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr6  = ARRAY [0..5] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr7  = ARRAY [0..6] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr8  = ARRAY [0..7] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr9  = ARRAY [0..8] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr10 = ARRAY [0..9] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr11 = ARRAY [0..10] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr12 = ARRAY [0..11] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr13 = ARRAY [0..12] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr14 = ARRAY [0..13] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr15 = ARRAY [0..14] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr16 = ARRAY [0..15] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr17 = ARRAY [0..16] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr18 = ARRAY [0..17] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr19 = ARRAY [0..18] OF ADDRESS;  

  Arr20 = ARRAY [0..19] OF ADDRESS;

  Arr21 = ARRAY [0..20] OF ADDRESS;

  Arr22 = ARRAY [0..21] OF ADDRESS;

  

  ArrMax = Arr22;

CONST

  Arr0 = Arr1 { NIL };

...

And when this DEF is included in my compile... above error. Out of

place.

Another one out of places was:

/opt/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0/m2/m2iso/Storage.def:58:1: error: not all variant record alternatives in the CASE clause are specified, hint you either need to specify each value of ‘CARDINAL’ or use an ELSE clause 

Easy to fix now I am in shape :), but probably something You would like

to fix.

BTW, did You receive another archive I sent to You?

Regards,

Dragiša