[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gm2] Returning a string constant
From: |
Gaius Mulley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gm2] Returning a string constant |
Date: |
03 Nov 2008 11:13:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
Iztok Kobal <address@hidden> writes:
> So, Gaius - please, keep GM2 clean, mean and lean, strictly inside
> standards, and thus allow modula-2 another chance in programming world.
> Its simplicity and safety should show that its use pays off !
>
> Regards !
>
> Iztok
Hi Iztok,
thanks for the interesting case history and examples. I'll try and
resist any new features - I'm currently aiming to finish the ISO
implementation in the compiler and the ISO libraries and then release
1.0. There will be quite a few minor releases along this path.
Interestingly Eric Raymond is writing a paper on C++ considered
harmful. http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=532
When writing programs in C++ I find I have to implement the solution
roughly 3x before I'm happy with the result - maybe due to my lack of
familiarity compared to other languages (C, M2 maybe). But on the
other hand I don't really think this is the case as I find Python a
delight and I've written much more C++ than Python.
In the above blog the authors talk about the very best programming
languages facilitating "flow". I can relate to this with Modula-2
and Python (nearly with C, but not when cross module boundaries :-)
regards,
Gaius
- Re: [Gm2] Returning a string constant,
Gaius Mulley <=