[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9
From: |
Ben Stuyts |
Subject: |
Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9 |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:10:24 +0200 |
Hi Gaius,
On 23 Apr 2003, Gaius Mulley wrote:
> thanks... it seems that there is some garbage at the end of
> PushAutoOff (the "Bx") should not be there
>
> /*
> ImplementationOrProgramModule :=
> % PushAutoOff Bx %
> ( ImplementationModule |
> ProgramModule )
> % PopAuto %
>...
> I wonder whether you can check that your gm2/bnf/m2-3.bnf contains the
> following rule at line 566:
>
> ImplementationOrProgramModule := % PushAutoOff % ( ImplementationModule |
> ProgramModule ) % PopAuto % =:
Yes, it it there:
ImplementationOrProgramModule := %
PushAutoOff %
( ImplementationModule | ProgramModule ) %
PopAuto %
=:
I am actually using the gcc-3.2+gm2-20030412.tar.gz file from your site, so
it should be ok, no? Or would it be better to use the latest cvs version?
By the way, I tried to compile it under FreeBSD 4.8 here, but even gcc fails
to build:
bison -y -d --name-prefix=__gettext --output plural.c
../../../gcc-3.2+gm2-20030412/gcc/intl/plural.y
conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
../../../gcc-3.2+gm2-20030412/gcc/intl/plural.y: expected 10 shift/reduce
conflicts
*** Error code 1
Stop in /home2/ben/src/gm2/host-build/gcc/intl.
*** Error code 1
That's why I thought I'd better get a Linux system over here. Oh well.... :-(
Thanks,
Ben
- [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9, Ben Stuyts, 2003/04/19
- Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9, Gaius Mulley, 2003/04/22
- Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9, Ben Stuyts, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9, Gaius Mulley, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9, Ben Stuyts, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9, Gaius Mulley, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9,
Ben Stuyts <=
- Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9, Gaius Mulley, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9, Ben Stuyts, 2003/04/23
- Re: [Gm2] Build problem on Redhat 9, Gaius Mulley, 2003/04/23