[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS vs xfs w/ inode64 (was: Missing files?)
From: |
Matthias Saou |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS vs xfs w/ inode64 (was: Missing files?) |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:01:53 +0200 |
Liam Slusser <address@hidden> wrote:
> Matthias,
>
> Just to run a few more tests....
>
> Centos 5.3 x86_64 on all systems in my test
[...]
>
> The ifree number didnt change after i ran the tests, all the files
> look to be fine and intact - so as far as i can tell everything is
> working fine.
>
> Did your tests show something else?
I guess the catch is that we have all of our clients running RHEL5
i386, and Avati pointed out that there is a limitation inside the fuse
client library, which is the one we seem to be hitting.
If anyone has a tested patch for fuse to work around this, then we'd be
very interested in trying it out!
Matthias
- [Gluster-devel] Missing files?, Roger Torrentsgenerós, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Missing files?, Anand Avati, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Missing files?, Roger Torrentsgenerós, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Missing files?, Matthias Saou, 2009/07/22
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Missing files?, Matthias Saou, 2009/07/23
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Missing files?, Liam Slusser, 2009/07/23
- Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS vs xfs w/ inode64 (was: Missing files?), Roger Torrentsgenerós, 2009/07/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS vs xfs w/ inode64 (was: Missing files?), Liam Slusser, 2009/07/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS vs xfs w/ inode64 (was: Missing files?), Matthias Saou, 2009/07/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS vs xfs w/ inode64 (was: Missing files?), Liam Slusser, 2009/07/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS vs xfs w/ inode64 (was: Missing files?),
Matthias Saou <=
- Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS vs xfs w/ inode64 (was: Missing files?), Anand Avati, 2009/07/28