[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ghm-discuss] flattr donations

From: John Darrington
Subject: Re: [Ghm-discuss] flattr donations
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:14:22 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Thanks very much for the information, John.

To whoever is maintaining the web page:   If this information was copied there,
I think there would be a lot more people you would consider donating.


On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:43:41PM -0400, John Sullivan wrote:
     John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
     > I tend to agree with Neal.
     > I don't in principle object to donating, but I'd rather not do it 
     > flattr (although I have no better suggestion for online donations), and 
     > I always ask questions before I donate to such causes.  
     > For example: 
     > * I really would like to know who or what is administrating the funds.
     The FSF receives the funds from Flattr and administers them.
     We've also discussed setting up a fund directly under the FSF that
     wouldn't require Flattr.
     > * what happens to the $50 I donate if the GHM has to be cancelled for 
     >   whatever reason.
     It would have to be "rolled over" to the next GHM. We're not currently
     able to handle refundable donations.
     > * What criteria are applied when assessing potential benefactors. In this
     >   case since the general public are being invited to donate, it would 
     >   consistent to also ask them to apply for such travel grants.  I would
     >   expect to see a "click here to apply for a grant" button next to the 
     >   "click here to donate button".
     This is up to the GHM organizers (subject to final approval from the
     FSF, but our concern will be based on due diligence things like
     providing documentation/receipts; we expect the organizers to decide the
     finer grained details like who out of the eligible pool should receive
     > With regard to operating costs, perhaps there is also the intention to 
do this,
     > but a collection at the end of the meeting is probably the best way to 
do it.
     This is also up to the organizers. There is no structural or FSF reason
     why the funds can't be used for operating expenses; but the organizers
     may decide they are best put toward travel expenses.

PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See or any PGP keyserver for public key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]