[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9
From: |
Bernd Paysan |
Subject: |
Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9 |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Feb 2025 10:31:10 +0100 |
Am Montag, 3. Februar 2025, 03:10:53 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb
Craig Treleaven:
> If someone would like to take over from me as port maintainer, that would be
> good. The MacPorts infrastructure is not complicated and Portfile syntax
> is well documented. The gforth port is about as simple as it gets. I’d be
> happy to provide some coaching for a new maintainer.
I'm maintaining the Debian and rpm based builds, the container builds; the
problem I have is that I have only non-root remote access to one ARM64-based
MacOS machine on cfarm.net. I would prefer if someone who likes to use MacOS
keeps checking if everything works, but can offer help.
--
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
net2o id: kQusJzA;7*?t=uy@X}1GWr!+0qqp_Cn176t4(dQ*
https://net2o.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9, Marvin Littlewood, 2025/02/02
- Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9, Bernd Paysan, 2025/02/02
- Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9, Craig Treleaven, 2025/02/02
- Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9, Anton Ertl, 2025/02/03
- Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9, Marvin Littlewood, 2025/02/03
- Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9, Craig Treleaven, 2025/02/03
- Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9, Marvin Littlewood, 2025/02/03
- Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9, Bernd Paysan, 2025/02/03
- Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9, Marvin Littlewood, 2025/02/04
Re: Toward a MacPorts port that tracks 0.7.9,
Bernd Paysan <=