[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ?

From: J. David Boyd
Subject: Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ?
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 13:14:07 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (cygwin)

Anton Ertl
<address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 10:04:22PM +0200, Bernd Paysan wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 30. April 2019, 17:12:34 CEST schrieb Anton Ertl:
>> > What do you think should be the default for .S and ~~: the classic or
>> > the smart .S ?
>> The question on today's net2o chat resulted in 3 votes against the smart .S 
>> by 
>> default.
> The same here and on comp.lang.forth.  So I guess that we will revert
> .S to be classic.
>> In ~~ it's a different question, because in ~~ you can't just type in 
>> something else to get that something else.
> I also think that ~~ should use the smart .S .
> - anton

I don't see anything wrong with ~~ using smart .S.  I just don't want .S to
return something that no one that is used to the real .S will expect...

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]