[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ?

From: Anton Ertl
Subject: Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ?
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 08:14:31 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 10:04:22PM +0200, Bernd Paysan wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 30. April 2019, 17:12:34 CEST schrieb Anton Ertl:
> > What do you think should be the default for .S and ~~: the classic or
> > the smart .S ?
> The question on today's net2o chat resulted in 3 votes against the smart .S 
> by 
> default.

The same here and on comp.lang.forth.  So I guess that we will revert
.S to be classic.

> In ~~ it's a different question, because in ~~ you can't just type in 
> something else to get that something else.

I also think that ~~ should use the smart .S .

- anton

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]