[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ?
|
From: |
Robert Wilkinson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] Classic or smart .S ? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 May 2019 21:51:09 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:36:16PM -0400, J. David Boyd wrote:
> Anton Ertl
> <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >
> > What do you think should be the default for .S and ~~: the classic or
> > the smart .S ?
> >
> > - anton
>
> I think .S should work as it always has, and you should come up with a new
> name for smart S, like .SS or something....
Agreed.
One of the beautiful aspects of forth is the facility to define new words.
R