[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] Built under Cygwin
From: |
Dennis Ruffer |
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] Built under Cygwin |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Sep 2011 10:33:29 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:gforth-
> address@hidden On Behalf Of Jan Chludzinski
> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 4:29 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [gforth] Built under Cygwin
>
> 1) I built gforth under Cygwin 1.7 (gcc (GCC) 4.5.3): ./configure -> make
->
> make check () -> make bench -> make install.
>
> There is one thing though, I got messages of the ilk (during "make
install"):
>
> make: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
> rm /usr/local/bin/gforth-fast.exe
/usr/local/bin/gforth-fast-0.7.0.exe
> rm: cannot remove `/usr/local/bin/gforth-fast.exe': No such file or
> directory
> rm: cannot remove `/usr/local/bin/gforth-fast-0.7.0.exe': No such
file or
> directory
>
> which I assume are simply attempts to delete old/obsolete executable - if
> they existed?
Those error messages are only a problem if it can't remove an older version.
If the current version is executed after you install it then you are safe.
> 2) I look in ~/gforth/gforth-0.7.0/test and noticed that checkans.out
had:
>
> Checking FACILITY-EXT wordset...
> Missing: EMIT?
>
> Checking TOOLKIT-EXT wordset...
> Missing: EDITOR FORGET
>
> ...
> FACILITY-EXT partial 5 / 6
> ...
> TOOLKIT-EXT partial 11 / 13
>
> Was this expected?
I hadn't noticed before, but do you care about having those words?
> 3) Finally, I noticed 3 patch files:
>
> 0.7.0-avoid-version.patch
> 0.7.0-vpath.patch
> gforth-0.7.0-1.cygwin.patch
>
> Should I run: "patch -p0 <patch-file> " on all three? None? Just
gforth-0.7.0-
> 1.cygwin.patch?
I am not aware of any reason to run them and haven't seen any problems by
not running them. I don't have them, so I'm not even sure what they do.
DaR
> ---Jan