|
From: | Yves Renard |
Subject: | Re: [Getfem-commits] please merge branch code_cleanup_to_pep8 |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:30:51 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 |
Dear Tetsuo,
I agree with Kostas on
this subject. On one side
the format is quite pleasant and quite legible on some
points. On the other hand,
some passages of the formatted code like
md.add_basic_contact_brick(
"u", "lambda_n", "lambda_t", "r", BN, BT, "friction_coeff", "ngap", "alpha", 1, ) with one
argument on each line is horrible for me. If the format is too
sparse this is not easy to read the code for me.
Additionnaly, some comments have been misaligned which is
really less readable.
Best
regards,
Yves
Le 25/06/2019 à 13:03, Tetsuo Koyama a
écrit :
Dear Kostas Thank you for your feedback.feel insecure with automatic formating toolsThat’s a good point. It may be too early to merge it to master. I should check script one by one. Any other comment? BR Tetsuo 2019年6月25日(火) 19:39 Konstantinos Poulios <address@hidden>:Hi, I am not sure about this. I like standardized strict code formatting but I personally feel insecure with automatic formating tools. BR Kostas On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:19 PM Tetsuo Koyama <address@hidden> wrote:Dear GetFEM++ project Hello. I formatted python script to pep8 by using black(https://github.com/python/black). Python developers are increasingly using black. I think that by defining the format of the script in the tool, we are freed from meaningless discussions about the format. I welcome any comments on this change. Thank you for your reading.
-- Yves Renard (address@hidden) tel : (33) 04.72.43.87.08 INSA-Lyon 20, rue Albert Einstein 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, FRANCE http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~renard --------- |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |