[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
gdb in inline functions
From: |
icegood |
Subject: |
gdb in inline functions |
Date: |
Mon, 24 May 2010 10:28:17 -0700 (PDT) |
Why gdb sssso ugly when has deal with inline functions?
Warning:
Cannot insert breakpoint 2.
Error accessing memory address 0x115: Input/Output error.
Why rather gcc so ugly with them? Why you just not substitute inlining with
non-inlining ones but with different names overriding
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling Name mangling ???
Like you did before overriding breakpoints for template functions? And no
linker errors while compiling!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/gdb-in-inline-functions-tp28659355p28659355.html
Sent from the Gnu - gdb - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- gdb in inline functions,
icegood <=