Re: [gcmd-dev] Further Gnome Commander development

[Vlad Grecescu]

Folks,

How about we make some kind of a public poll, where anyone speaks up for
his most useful gnome commander feature (I know Michael has a dozen
prepared).
Then a second one about the most missed feature(s).

This way, we would at least be able to come up with a means of determining
what is GC3 for its users.

Since we're talking about software that's distributed through means of
distros' packagers, I propose we pop up the announcement for the poll in
the first run of gnome-commander when updating next.

This way, we would gather 'requirements'. Picking technologies is easy: use
Gtk:) But internally on this ML you can poll the developers on what they
would be more comfortable with (Python? Vala? D?)

Anyway, just my thoughts..

--
V;ad

On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:03 PM, <address@hidden> wrote:

> > Hi guys,
> Hi
> > I wonder what is needed to revive further development of Gnome Commander.
> >
> > Having tried to patch a few thing myself I see the fact Gnome
> > Commander is implemented in C/C++ as it's biggest problem to attract
> > more interest and implement any major change like Gnome 3 support or
> > archive browsing. Plug-in development already moves away from C/C++ by
> > providing a Python interface.
>
> I have almost no experience with Python but with C++
>
> > What are your thoughts?
>
> I think GC is a good one and I am willing to support the development if
> possible.
>
> Cheers Markus
>
> _______________________________________________
> gcmd-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcmd-devel
>