Re: gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!  Yes, we will alas need a cleanup 2.6.14 release in the
immediate future.  In general I like the lifetime of releases to be
long, but in this case we released assuming the current gcc had a bug
that needed fixing, and only found out after release that the behavior
was deliberate.  We cannot leave a gcl stable out there long term which
is incompatible with the latest gcc.  I am just waiting on
ftp-upload@gnu.org to sort out the signature issues before proceeding.
In the meantime, please report any 2.6.14pre show stoppers asap.

Take care,

> On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 10:10 AM Camm Maguire <camm@maguirefamily.org> wrote:
> 
>     Greetings!  Correct -- my upload was rejected for an as yet undetermined
>     signature verification failure.  I am corresponding with them about it,
>     and received my first reply yesterday.....
> 
> Will there be an updated version of 2.6.13 that includes a fix for gcc 12?  
> Or do I have to wait for 2.6.14?  If the latter, it would be nice to have 
> that released soon; I'd like to be able to build maxima
> with a released version of gcl instead of some random commit of gcl that has 
> the fix.
> 
>     Take care,
>    
>     Jerry James <loganjerry@gmail.com> writes:

-- 
Camm Maguire                                        camm@maguirefamily.org
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah