binary modules

[Andy Wingo]

Did you notice this? It sounds interesting indeed. g-wrapped modules
don't actually need any scheme code. I don't think, however, that
1.6/1.7 guile can do this.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden>
Reply-To: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Guile-SDL 0.2.4 available
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:15:33 +0200
README excerpt:
[...]
  * Guile that can load binary module (a b c) from file a/b/c.so on %load-path

NEWS excerpt:

  - 0.2.4 | 2004-06-28
  
    - installation change: scheme wrappers eliminated
  
        The module (sdl sdl) used to be a scheme wrapper for binary
        module (sdl sdl-sup).  Now it is the binary module itself.
        See README.  Also, (sdl sdl) no longer provides the procs
        `call-with-clip-rect' and `rotate-square'.
  
        On "make install" if file $(GUILE_SITE)/sdl/sdl.scm exists,
        it is deleted.  If the dir $(GUILE_SITE)/sdl is empty as a
        result, it is also deleted.
[...]

--
Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
http://ambient.2y.net/wingo/