[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error
From: |
Lawrence D'Oliveiro |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error |
Date: |
Mon, 7 May 2018 08:54:27 +1200 |
On Sun, 6 May 2018 22:07:53 +0200, Gregor Mückl wrote:
> On 5/6/2018 9:56 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 6 May 2018 09:47:19 +0200, Gregor Mückl wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, on the way up to the exception handler in main(), stack
>>> unwinding causes destructors of various objects to be called. That
>>> way, RAII patterns in my code get executed: resources are freed,
>>> files are closed (writing buffered file contents to disk) etc.
>
>> What happens if you have another FT_Face to dispose of?
>
> Why would that matter? I cannot see the relevance to the topic.
In the process of recovering from the error in disposing of the first
one, do you try to dispose of the second one?
- Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, (continued)
Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2018/05/05
- Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, Gregor Mückl, 2018/05/05
- Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2018/05/05
- Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, Gregor Mückl, 2018/05/06
- Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2018/05/06
- Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, Gregor Mückl, 2018/05/06
Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2018/05/06
Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, Gregor Mückl, 2018/05/06
Re: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <=
Message not availableRe: [ft] FT_Done_Face Should Not Return An Error, Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 2018/05/07