freetype
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft] Glyph issue in freetype 2.3.10


From: Manoj Kumar Bhatta
Subject: Re: [ft] Glyph issue in freetype 2.3.10
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:27:49 +0530

>> I'm afraid something wrong in Pango, and it
>> might be long-term issue to analize why this trouble
>> occurs.

I have updated Pango library from 1.22.1 to 2.18.0 and the problem solved !!!
Now I can see arabic/indic properly.

Thanks for your help.


On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Manoj Kumar Bhatta <address@hidden> wrote:
>>I'm afraid something wrong in Pango, and it
>> might be long-term issue to analize why this trouble
>> occurs.
>
> I also think,there may be problem with pango/pangoft2.
> But I have no clues now where is the problem exactly.
>
>> OK, please tell me the versions of component softwares:
>> GLib, Cairo and Pango, and configuration options you used
>
> Software and its versions.
>
> GLib: 1.17.6 ( config with  --with-libiconv
> --enable-iconv-cache--disable-selinux  --disable-fam --disable-xattr )
>
> Cairo: 1.8.10 ( config with --enable-directfb=yes --enable-xcb=no
> --without-x --disable-xlib --disable-xlib-xrender  --disable-win32
> --disable-pdf --disable-ps --disable-svg --enable-png )
>
> Pango: 1.22.1 ( config with  --without-x )
>
> Though, I have updated cairo-1.10.0. But did not work.
>
> -Manoj
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:49 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you very much for screen shots. Apparently,
>> there is shaping error, the enclosing vowel signs
>> are not reordered to form correct ligature.
>>
>> However, unfortunately, I (and maybe Werner too) have
>> no candidates in my mind about the root causing this
>> error. I'm afraid something wrong in Pango, and it
>> might be long-term issue to analize why this trouble
>> occurs.
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:17:15 +0530
>> Manoj Kumar Bhatta <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>>> 1) how many prebuilt libraries in your DirectFB/GTK?
>>>>   a) all are prebuilt by external developer (e.g. some Linux distributors)
>>>>   b) all, except of freetype-2.3.10
>>>>   c) all, except of previous freetype-2.3.9 & current 2.3.10.
>>>>   d) other combinations
>>>
>>>We have built all the libraries from its source.( including DirectFB
>>>to freetype)
>>>We built freetype 2.3.9 and freetype 2.3.10 to check the issue.
>>
>> OK, please tell me the versions of component softwares:
>> GLib, Cairo and Pango, and configuration options you used
>> (if you have any account to a web server with huge storage,
>>  I want to obtain your building directory of the components).
>>
>> I will make a modified Pango showing many many debugging
>> messages, to trace its Indic shaper behaviour. Maybe using
>> "pango-view" is sufficient to check the shaper's behaviour.
>>
>> Regards,
>> mpsuzuki
>>
>>>On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 5:05 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:49:27 +0530
>>>> Manoj Kumar Bhatta <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>I have used freetype 2.3.9 to display Indic/arabic language using gtk.
>>>>>It displays correctly with its contextual interpretation.
>>>>>But when I changed to freetype-2.3.10, I can see only original form of
>>>>>each glyph, thus without any contextual
>>>>>interpretation.
>>>>>My environment is DirectFB/GTK.
>>>>>
>>>>>Can anyone suggest what can be the issue ?
>>>>
>>>> Umm, it's not easy for me to setup DirectFB/GTK environment
>>>> soon, so please let me know more detail about your trouble.
>>>>
>>>> 1) how many prebuilt libraries in your DirectFB/GTK?
>>>>
>>>> 2) how did you update freetype?
>>>>
>>>> As far as I know, the text layout engine in GTK (Pango/
>>>> HarfBuzz) does not rely any functionalities of FreeType2
>>>> for Arabic/Indic text layout, it invokes FreeType2 to
>>>> translate from Unicode to glyph index, and load a glyph
>>>> data by glyph index. If these 2 functionalities are broken,
>>>> I guess, the component glyphs would be wrong already
>>>> (not contextual layout error). If you can make some
>>>> screenshots, it's appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> mpsuzuki
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]