[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: [ft] Vertical font layout
From: |
Paresh Deshmukh |
Subject: |
RE: Re: [ft] Vertical font layout |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 06:42:21 UT |
Hi,
256 is incompatible with other value, I check bbox values it is perfectly fine.
Here is some values:
Char A:
BBox Info: Bitmap Info:
xMin 3 Rows: 35
yMin 1 Width: 37
xMax 40 Pitch: 37
yMax 36
advance(x,y) value is (0,256).
Char ' '(SPACE)
BBox Info: Bitmap Info:
xMin 0 Rows: 0
yMin 0 Width: 0
xMax 0 Pitch: 0
yMax 0
advance(x,y) value is (0,256).
Char g:
BBox Info: Bitmap Info:
xMin 5 Rows: 31
yMin 1 Width: 24
xMax 29 Pitch: 24
yMax 32
advance(x,y) value is (0,256).
so irrespective of charecter it is giving same 256 as advance. Please comment is
it problem with my approch or its a defect in freetype(2.1.7).
Thanks
Paresh
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 14:24:32 UT
> Paresh Deshmukh <address@hidden> wrote:
> > What is the problem with vertical layout.
> >I am using MsMincho which support vertical layout and I am also cross
checking
> >it with FT_HAS_VERTICAL( face ). I am getting glyph but the advance value is
> >always the same i.e. 256.
>
> Excuse me, I ask a silly question: the advance value 256 is
> incompatible with other value (e.g. you got 1024 from anywhere
> else) ? Or, you think the value may be varied but you got
> constant value?
>
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki