[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] scalable font metrics, ascent/descent/height, metrics struct
From: |
Anson |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] scalable font metrics, ascent/descent/height, metrics struct |
Date: |
Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:09 +0100 |
Sorry to confuse you. Let me put it in another word. By far I have
found 3 sets of ascent/descent/height metrics. We have
ascender/descender/height from FT_Face. We have
ascender/descender/height from FT_Size_Metrics. We also have
sTypoAscender/sTypoDescender from TT_Face. How do they differ from
each other? By ascent and descent do they include Latin characters
*only* or do they include alphabets with ascent/descent (e.g. U with
umlaut on top or K with cedilla at the bottom.) Apparently the latter
would have greater values than the former.
On 5/24/05, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > What I mean with "distinguish"ing A and Aring is that if FreeType
> > provides two sets of metrics attributes, one to include *only* Latin
> > characters and one to include alphabets with ascent/descent (e.g. U
> > with umlaut on top or K with cedilla at the bottom.)
>
> Metrics attribute sets? What's that? I've no idea what you are
> talking about. Please give an example. I believe there must be a
> misunderstanding.
>
>
> Werner
- [ft] scalable font metrics, ascent/descent/height, metrics struct, Anson, 2005/05/18
- Re: [ft] scalable font metrics, ascent/descent/height, metrics struct, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/05/24
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [ft] scalable font metrics, ascent/descent/height, metrics struct,
Anson <=
- Re: [ft] scalable font metrics, ascent/descent/height, metrics struct, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/05/25
- Re: [ft] scalable font metrics, ascent/descent/height, metrics struct, Anson, 2005/05/25
- Re: [ft] scalable font metrics, ascent/descent/height, metrics struct, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/05/26
- Re: [ft] scalable font metrics, ascent/descent/height, metrics struct, Anson, 2005/05/31