[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Freetype] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs
From: |
Vadim Plessky |
Subject: |
[Freetype] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:46:39 +0000 |
On Thursday 12 July 2001 19:10, Pedriana, Paul wrote:
| >>Windows disables font smoothing <14pt, so it's
| >>hard to compare FreeType with AA and Windows's
| >>TT rasterizer generating Black&White pixmaps.
|
| I don't think it is doing this exactly so on my machine. Here is a
| picture of Windows' Wordpad on my Windows 2000 machine with the letter 'z'
| drawn in Times Roman normal, bold, italic, and bold-italic at successive
| integral point sizes from 5-26.
|
|
| The 5 and 6 point sizes are being anti-aliased, 7-13 are not, and 14+
| are. When antialiasing is turned off, none of the letters are anti-aliased.
yes, that's was the point highlighted by David Turner.
I *enabled* Anti-Aliasing for point sizes 7-13 on my Linux (KDE/QT) box.
Screenshot I posted was made in KDE, using KWord word processor from KOffice
suite.
Some *blurring* (or *dirty*) inside several letters was caused by this.
// so, I was *guilty* in producing this effect
*Disabling* AA for point sizes 7-13 (like it was before) , of course, fixed
this blurring.
It's not applicable to compare Windows (either 98 or 2000) and KDE / XFree86
at all, as I don't know any way to enable AA for 7pt-13pt in Windows.
Rendering output *without AA* is appx. the same on Windows and KDE.
But, I think there is a way to fix these letters with AA enabled, than there
will be no reason to disable AA at all :-))
|
| Also, I don't see any missing diagonal in these Zs, but maybe I don't
| have it set up properly to show this error.
--
Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru (English)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html
Do you have Arial font installed? Just test it!
http://kde2.newmail.ru/font_test_arial.html
- Re: [Freetype] Re: PS Type1 vs. TrueType, (continued)
- Re: [Fonts]Re: [Freetype] Re: PS Type1 vs. TrueType, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/07/17
- Re: [Freetype] Re: PS Type1 vs. TrueType, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2001/07/14
- Re: [Freetype] Re: PS Type1 vs. TrueType, David Turner, 2001/07/14
- Re: [Freetype] Re: PS Type1 vs. TrueType, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2001/07/14
- [Freetype] Re: [Render] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/13
- [Freetype] Re: [Render] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs, David Turner, 2001/07/13
Re: [Freetype] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/12
[Freetype] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs,
Vadim Plessky <=
[Freetype] Re: Arial ttf - bad rendering of some glyphs, Vadim Plessky, 2001/07/13
[Freetype] Could people avoid sending attachments to the list?, Wenlin Institute, 2001/07/13