[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update on community bonding phase: Plans on refactoring ftinspect
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Update on community bonding phase: Plans on refactoring ftinspect |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jun 2022 08:35:26 +0000 (UTC) |
>> [Charlie, please subscribe to the 'freetype-devel' mailing list.]
>
> But I can still manage my subscription status on
> https://lists.nongnu.org/ . Is my subscription accidentally dropped?
Ah, your status was 'moderated' for some unknown reason. Now fixed.
>> I don't know. What would be the advantage of having everything in a
>> single file?
>
> IMO, those widgets could be considered "auxiliary components", and
> are pretty far from the core logic. Therefore, it should be made
> less "loud" (it's 8 source files out of 23 in total - more than 1/3
> !)
OK. I have no objections.
>> Well, the coding style of `ftinspect` is *far* more standard than
>> the FreeType library itself:-)
>
> I will try to imitate it at my best. I'm using the .clang-format
> file from FreeType project - should I do that?
Good question, I don't know. I've never used it, but it probably
doesn't work as expected for the `ftinspect` source code. In case you
find (or create) a proper formatting style file, we can add it to the
git repository.
Werner