[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions
From: |
Vincent Torri |
Subject: |
Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:59:58 +0200 |
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 7:07 AM Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> > I don't think we want to statically link any SVG renderer to the
> > library by default. There are so many subtleties related to vector
> > graphics rendering, that there is no "good" default choice to make.
> > In other words, any default we select at link time would probably be
> > inappropriate for a lot of developers anyway.
>
> I agree. However, I want to have a default SVG rendering engine
> detected automatically at configure time, and which can be easily
> overridden by a configure option. Ideally, this is default is SVG
> Native
>
> https://github.com/adobe/svg-native-viewer
>
> Unfortunately, development seems to be stalled; we probably have to go
> for something else. Moazin right now is doing another GSoC project;
> according to an e-mail exchange with him he plans to work again on the
> SVG stuff after GSoC will have finished.
for what it worth, in our project, we use freetype engine to render svg
regards
Vincent Torri
- FT_Add_Module() and related functions, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/06/09
- Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions, David Turner, 2020/06/11
- Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/06/12
- Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions,
Vincent Torri <=
- Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions, Moazin Khatri, 2020/06/12
- Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/06/12
- Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions, Vincent Torri, 2020/06/12
- Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2020/06/12
- Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions, Vincent Torri, 2020/06/12
Re: FT_Add_Module() and related functions, Moazin Khatri, 2020/06/12