[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2018 21:59:00 +0200 (CEST) |
> On line 243 [of `ftcommon.c'], it checks for the extension of the
> font file and proceeds further. Now `type1' files have fixed
> extensions `pfa' or `pfb' so there is no problem, but `gf' or `pk'
> files can have varied extensions and thus is not invoking the `tfm'
> module, what do you suggest?
Well, simply extend the code to expect file names of the form
<name> '.' [<integer>] 'gf'
[It perhaps makes sense to emit a minor warning on stderr in case the
value of <integer> doesn't fit the GF file's resolution.]
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/25
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/25
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/25
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/25
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/25
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/25
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/27
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/27
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/27
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/28
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/28
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/20
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/20
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/20
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Parth Wazurkar, 2018/07/20
- Re: [ft-devel] GF + TFM, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/07/20