[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jan 2017 09:50:20 +0100 (CET) |
> I wonder whether I should hook up the incremental loading stuff to
> get 14.ttf to work with the new backend - after all, the rest of
> FontVal already checks hmtx, and the hinting/rastering backend don't
> really need to care about advance widths perhaps. Although that's
> unusual usage of Freetype, but ghostscript already uses freetype
> that way.
This sounds like an interesting and sensible approach.
> Lastly I think this was mentioned before: 15.ttf, 26.ttc have rather
> broken EBDT's so they fails with FreeType rather early, but the 1.0
> backend can go a lot further; and 26.ttc is mostly an old authentic
> microsoft font (with DSIG removed but otherwise identical),
Oh no, it's not identical! There is a lot of invalid glyph outline
data in this font.
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/01/01
- Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Jan Bruns, 2017/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Jan Bruns, 2017/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/01/03
- Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Jan Bruns, 2017/01/04
- Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/01/04
Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/01/02
- Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts,
Werner LEMBERG <=
Re: [ft-devel] what old/new FontVal says about these fonts, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/01/03