[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] about FT_Open_Args
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] about FT_Open_Args |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:23:55 +0100 (CET) |
> In the doc, I can see that FT_Open_Args is a structure. Why isn't it
> a union?
I no longer remember, sorry. I guess David Turner can't remember
either – it was introduced 16 years ago...
> Imho, a union is exactly what should be used and can save some
> bytes.
Maybe. However, `FT_Open_Args' is defined in a public header and thus
can't be changed due to ABI backwards compatibility issues.
Werner