[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph()
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph() |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 2016 06:13:31 +0100 (CET) |
>> Well, wouldn't it be easier to stop rounding to pixels integers
>> instead if the hinting doesn't change the advance widths anyway?
>
> The bitmaps would be delivered to target surface at pixel integers
> anyway whether you round advance or not.
The bitmaps, yes, but we are talking about the possibility to shift
glyphs by a call to `FT_Set_Transform', where the shift value is in
the range [0;1] (or rather [-0.5;0.5]), and this call takes place
*before* hinting, which is not possible currently.
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/03
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2016/11/05
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/06
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2016/11/06
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/06
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2016/11/06
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/11/06
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(),
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2016/11/07
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/08
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/07
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2016/11/06
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2016/11/22
- Re: [ft-devel] Clean-up of af_loader_load_glyph(), Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/27