[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:45:35 +0100 (CET) |
From: Behdad Esfahbod <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 01:36:48 -0600
> On 13-01-11 02:02 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> Not yet, sorry. IMHO the first step for the next release is to
>> comment out the line
>>
>> #define FT_CONFIG_OPTION_OLD_INTERNALS
>>
>> in `ftoption.h' so that the old internals are still available but no
>> longer activated by default. I've done that right now.
>
> Did you push it to master? I don't see.
Yes, it's the last commit, e4ecce3.
Werner
- [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/10
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, David Turner, 2013/01/10
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/10
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/10
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/11
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/11
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/11
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/12
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/12
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/12
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/12
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/12
- Re: [ft-devel] ttsbit.c vs ttsbit0.c, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/12