[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n)
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n) |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Oct 2012 07:54:28 +0200 (CEST) |
> Auto-kerning is, however, a totally different story. Freetype
> should be able to provide some shape descriptors to help fitting the
> neighboring glyphs. For example, some sort of top, middle, and
> bottom protrusion to the right and to the left of center.
> Undeniably, Freetype is supposed to know the shape best.
Indeed, if someone is going to implement live auto-kerning, FreeType
has to expose this.
Werner
- [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Vinnie Falco, 2012/10/03
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/03
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Vinnie Falco, 2012/10/03
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Emile van Bergen, 2012/10/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), emile-ft, 2012/10/03
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Adam Twardoch (List), 2012/10/03
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), James Cloos, 2012/10/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/05
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), suzuki toshiya, 2012/10/04
Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Adam Twardoch (List), 2012/10/03