[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n)
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n) |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Oct 2012 07:36:39 +0200 (CEST) |
> Multimedia container files like AVI or MOV have audio and video
> streams, plus optional streams like subtitles etc. Each such stream
> can typically use various codecs for various flavors of audio or
> video. [...]
Adam, this is an excellent analogy! Thanks for that.
> HOWEVER: I must agree with Behdad though that "gasp" *definitely*
> should be supported by FreeType. Basically, in the "default
> grayscale rendering", it should actually be grayscale+monochrome as
> defined by gasp. In the "default subpixel rendering", it should be
> subpixel+Y-smoothing as defined by gasp. The user should be able to
> override these ("force grayscale" or "force monochrome") but "gasp"
> is definitely NOT external to glyph rendering, it's very
> *essential*.
OK. So FreeType should obey the `gasp' table by default? Or should
this be a new FT_LOAD flag? Or a rendering flag?
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), emile-ft, 2012/10/03
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Adam Twardoch (List), 2012/10/03
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), James Cloos, 2012/10/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/05
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Werner LEMBERG, 2012/10/04
- Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), suzuki toshiya, 2012/10/04
Re: [ft-devel] Getting the kerning pairs in under O(n*n), Adam Twardoch (List), 2012/10/03