[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1 |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:18:16 +0200 (CEST) |
Alexei,
thanks for working on this; I fear I won't have more time in the near
future to give more thoughts to the problem.
Just a minor remark:
> FT_ORIENTATION_NONE is supposed to mean CANNOT BE DETERMINED, which
> is easier said than done. Any contour has a well defined orientation
> as a sign of the area it covers: plus or minus. It is only the
> degenerate contours or the contours with self-intersections that can
> have zero coverage area and, therefore, undetermined orientation.
There is a difference between `cannot be determined' (by the used
algorithm) and `is undetermined' (in the mathematical sense). I think
FreeType only refers to the former, even if the implementation doesn't
work as expected.
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2012/04/01
- Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2012/04/09
- Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/04/10
- Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1, Behdad Esfahbod, 2012/04/19
- Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2012/04/20
- Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1, Behdad Esfahbod, 2012/04/24
- Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2012/04/24
- Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1, Behdad Esfahbod, 2012/04/24
Re: [ft-devel] [patch] emboldening rework v1, Behdad Esfahbod, 2012/04/10