Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF

[Ivan Nincic]

Hi Suzuki, 
I think the font may have worked for older Acrobat Reader versions. 
IvanN


-----Original Message-----
From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 5:42 AM
To: Werner LEMBERG
Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF

Another followup for the standard behaviour.
Although Adobe Acrobat 9 on Microsoft Windows does not show any glyphs for
sample PDF, sample OTF can be browsed by fontview.exe (on Microsoft Windows
XP SP2).

Regards,
mpsuzuki

suzuki toshiya wrote (2012/04/14 21:23):
> Ah, I slipped to check what is the standard behaviour, thank you.
> I got same results on Adobe Acrobat 9 on Microsft Windows and Preview 
> (5.0.3) on Mac OS X.
> 
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki

-----Original Message-----
From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 2:00 AM
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF

It seems that bb211ce6ce7f712e4cc4423e93c6c13780122512
(2011-09-07, between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7) relates this change of the behaviour.
The changeset was introduced to fix savannah bug #33816. I should take a
look more in detail and think how to fix both issues.

Regards,
mpsuzuki

suzuki toshiya wrote:
> I will check which changeset relates this difference.
> 
> Ivan Nincic wrote:
>> Hello Werner,
>>
>> FYI: I run into a regression issue with the latest FT (trunk) version.
>> Attached is a sample font. I don't claim that this is a valid font 
>> however FT was able to render the file in 2.4.4 but not in 2.4.9.
>>
>> IvanN
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freetype-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel