[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening
From: |
Alexei Podtelezhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:16:47 -0400 |
> On 30/10/2011 08:25, Vivek Rathod wrote:
> according to Hain's paper
> dmax = (s/L) * dnorm ; here s is not normalized. dmax is the tolerance for
> flatness and dnorm is the normalized flatness of the curve.
>
> so s_limit = (dmax / dnorm) * L ; by putting dnorm = 0.75 we get the
> permissible height of the control point for the curve not to be split.
>
> so should we not be comparing s= abs(dy * dxi - dx * dyi) with s_limit *
> L instead of s and s_limit ( because s is perpendicular distance of
> control point multiplied by L) ?
It is actually not just cross-product but
s = abs(dx * dxi - dx * dyi) / L
otherwise the dimensionality is wrong.
Some Hain's equations just need to be creatively modified to avoid divisions
in the code.
- Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening, Graham Asher, 2011/10/30
- Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening,
Alexei Podtelezhnikov <=
- Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/10/31
- Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening, Vivek Rathod, 2011/10/31
- Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2011/10/31
- Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening, Vivek Rathod, 2011/10/31
- Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2011/10/31
- Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2011/10/31
- Re: [ft-devel] regarding freetype 2 cubic curve flattening, Vivek Rathod, 2011/10/31