Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

freetype-devel (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Tue Oct 26 2010 02:06:06 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• October 26, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 02:06
• October 25, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 20:11
• October 24, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Leon Woestenberg, 18:38
• October 22, 2010
  • [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 01:12
• October 21, 2010
  • [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 21:13
• October 20, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] How to get the position of a glyph without rendering it, Albert Astals Cid, 15:41
  • [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 08:55
  • Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, GRAHAM ASHER, 08:28
  • [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 08:19
• October 19, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] How to get the position of a glyph without rendering it, mpsuzuki, 23:49
  • [ft-devel] How to get the position of a glyph without rendering it, Albert Astals Cid, 20:29
• October 18, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] harmonize conic and cubic splines, Sean McBride, 20:49
  • Re: [ft-devel] harmonize conic and cubic splines, Алексей Подтележников, 18:39
  • Re: [ft-devel] harmonize conic and cubic splines, Werner LEMBERG, 10:47
  • Re: [ft-devel] harmonize conic and cubic splines, GRAHAM ASHER, 08:54
  • Re: [ft-devel] harmonize conic and cubic splines, Алексей Подтележников, 08:11
  • Re: [ft-devel] harmonize conic and cubic splines, GRAHAM ASHER, 04:16
• October 17, 2010
  • [ft-devel] harmonize conic and cubic splines, Алексей Подтележников, 23:37
  • [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 23:36
  • [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Werner LEMBERG, 04:53
• October 16, 2010
  • [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd, Алексей Подтележников, 23:41
• October 15, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Werner LEMBERG, 14:48
• October 14, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, James Cloos, 14:11
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Werner LEMBERG, 10:02
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 07:56
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 07:42
  • RE: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, David Bevan, 04:02
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, James Cloos, 01:52
• October 13, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 21:12
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Werner LEMBERG, 09:41
  • RE: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, David Bevan, 09:29
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, GRAHAM ASHER, 09:16
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 08:15
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, GRAHAM ASHER, 08:02
• October 12, 2010
  • [ft-devel] FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL, Алексей Подтележников, 21:25
• October 08, 2010
  • [ft-devel] [patch] simplify and speed up smooth cubic splines, Алексей Подтележников, 23:51
  • Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] grammar nit., Werner LEMBERG, 06:07
  • Re: [ft-devel] [freetype 2.4.3] Does not build, Werner LEMBERG, 01:32
• October 07, 2010
  • [ft-devel] [PATCH] grammar nit., Ed, 22:36
  • Re: [ft-devel] [freetype 2.4.3] Does not build, Sean McBride, 18:28
  • Re: [ft-devel] [freetype 2.4.3] Does not build, Bug Reporter, 17:36
  • Re: [ft-devel] [freetype 2.4.3] Does not build, Werner LEMBERG, 14:48
  • [ft-devel] [freetype 2.4.3] Does not build, Bug Reporter, 14:37
  • Re: [ft-devel] Invalid Preprocessor directive: #include FT_FREETYPE_H, Werner LEMBERG, 01:36
• October 06, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] Invalid Preprocessor directive: #include FT_FREETYPE_H, RustyBucket, 19:28
  • [ft-devel] Re: configure bug in freetype 2.4,3 on solaris, Robert Cohen, 05:45
  • [ft-devel] configure bug in freetype 2.4,3 on solaris, Robert Cohen, 05:44
  • [ft-devel] Re: configure bug in freetype 2.4,3 on solaris, Werner LEMBERG, 05:07
  • Re: [ft-devel] Invalid Preprocessor directive: #include FT_FREETYPE_H, RustyBucket, 01:11
  • Re: [ft-devel] Invalid Preprocessor directive: #include FT_FREETYPE_H, Alan Coopersmith, 00:44
  • Re: [ft-devel] Invalid Preprocessor directive: #include FT_FREETYPE_H, Werner LEMBERG, 00:21
  • Re: [ft-devel] Invalid Preprocessor directive: #include FT_FREETYPE_H, RustyBucket, 00:00
• October 05, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] Invalid Preprocessor directive: #include FT_FREETYPE_H, Alan Coopersmith, 23:47
  • Re: [ft-devel] Invalid Preprocessor directive: #include FT_FREETYPE_H, RustyBucket, 23:39
• October 03, 2010
  • Re: [ft-devel] [patch] on the subject of better splines, Алексей Подтележников, 21:35
  • [ft-devel] FreeType 2.4.3 has been released, Werner LEMBERG, 15:05
  • Re: [ft-devel] [patch] fix for building freetype-native on a symlinked build environment, Werner LEMBERG, 14:19
  • Re: [ft-devel] [patch] on the subject of better splines, Graham Asher, 07:21
• October 01, 2010
  • [ft-devel] [patch] on the subject of better splines, Алексей Подтележников, 22:57
  • Re: Generic data/callback (was Re: [ft-devel] Cache subsystem question, Werner LEMBERG, 01:49

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc