Re: [ft-devel] Searching for an FT2 tester program

[David Turner]

Hello,

thanks a lot for your work. Can you add some clarification to the ChangeLog of the first patch that explain why it is needed ?

Regarding the second patch, the internal code uses the convention of naming functions as:

object_method( Object*  o, .... )

It would be nicer if you could keep the convention instead of prepending an extra FT_Library parameter at the start of the
function. Indeed, you should instead store the FT_Library handle into the CFF_Parser object and pass it to cff_parser_init,
then re-use it in subsequent functions. This will make the code much clearer.

2009/3/18 Oran Agra <address@hidden>

I'm working in my local master branch so I guess 'git rebase' is not necessary.

Attached are first two patches that are not related to PIC.
Please tell me if the comments and git patches are ok.

I'll add the documentation you requested.
And I've verified that VS2005 and VS6 are compiling the PIC code including all the macros.


_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel