Re: [ft-devel] subrs length checking

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > but it has always worked in the past (probably the Subr is never
> > called).  Is it sensible to cover this as a special case by
> > relaxing the check to be < rather than <= ?
> 
> I introduced this as a security check; malformed Type 1 fonts can
> crash FreeType otherwise.  Looking at the code lines which follow I
> think `<=' is necessary.

Ah, sorry, I checked too fast.  Yes, it seems as if `<' would be
possible.  I still need the font to test that...


    Werner